Gonzalo Bueno vs Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Oct at 05:45 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Bueno vs S. Alejandro Linde Palacios

PER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

COL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bueno 1 - 0 Palacios
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gonzalo Bueno winning 2 and Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios winning 0. The last match between Gonzalo Bueno and Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios was at the Cali Challenger, 06-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Gonzalo Bueno getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bueno | 1 |
| Palacios | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Cali Challenger(10-06-25)
G. Bueno vs S. A. L. Palacios H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.69% (142-113) | Career Total W/L | 54.44% (49-41) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 100.00% (2-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Bueno vs S. A. L. Palacios Match Preview:
- When examining second serve performance over the last six months, Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios has a slight edge, winning 40.75% of points compared to Gonzalo Bueno's 40.40%. Could this give Palacios a vital edge?
- In recent return game stats, Bueno outperforms Palacios on both opponent's second serve (46.45% vs. 45.00%) and first serve (33.62% vs. 29.38%). This could signal Bueno's superiority in breaking serve.
- Under pressure, Palacios has saved 52.26% of breakpoints compared to Bueno's 52.04%. While the difference is minimal, Palacios shows resilience under tough situations.
- When it comes to match victories over the past year, Palacios holds a higher win percentage at 57.38% compared to Bueno's 53.52%. Is consistency on Palacios' side?
- Surface preference might play a role: Palacios excels on hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Bueno is stronger on clay with the same win percentage.
- Palacios has won more matches at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events (58.62%), while Bueno competes more often at higher-level Challengers/ITF >$10K events with a 50.82% success rate. Does the difference in event level affect their head-to-head predictions?
- Considering opponent quality, Palacios has faced players with an average rank of 270.72, indicating he competes against marginally tougher opponents than Bueno, whose opponents have an average rank of 302.37.
- In deciding sets, Bueno has a slight advantage, winning 64% compared to Palacios' 63%, indicating a similar level of competitiveness when matches go the distance.
- Current event performance could tip the scale further, though specific data at this event weren't provided.
Editorial Prediction (October 6, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance metrics, Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios shows a modest advantage in second serve success rates, while Gonzalo Bueno counters with stronger return games. This contrast could ultimately define match dynamics.
Palacios has demonstrated greater breakpoint resilience, yet Bueno's edge in deciding sets might make him more formidable in prolonged matches. The slight superiority Palacios shows in past win percentages might slightly favor him under the right conditions.
Surface conditions might play a consequential role; should the match occur on hard courts, Palacios could leverage his preferred playing surface. On the other hand, Bueno’s proficiency in clay is noteworthy for future encounters on that surface.
Factoring event participation, Bueno's experience in higher-level tournaments could prepare him better, contrasting with Palacios’s more frequent success in lower-tier events.
Considering these aspects, Gonzalo Bueno seems to have a slight edge in this matchup, predicted to give him a better chance to prevail.
Gonzalo Bueno vs Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Bueno vs S. A. L. Palacios H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:19:40 | Average Match Time | 1:19:40 |
| 67% (41/61) | 1st Serve % | 69% (36/52) |
| 78% (32/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
| 50% (26/52) | Return Points Win % | 34% (21/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Bueno Recent Matches Played
S. A. L. Palacios Recent Matches Played

G. Bueno vs S. A. L. Palacios Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.69% (142/113) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.44% (49/41) |
| 53.72% (318/274) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.24% (105/96) |
| 51.07% (2816/2698) | Games Win/Loss | 51.73% (972/907) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (28/21) |
| 56.22% (140/109) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.22% (21/20) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 202 | Aces Total | 81 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 529 | Total Double Faults | 137 |
| 1:46:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 385.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 238.99 |
| 66% (11279/17207) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2090/3312) |
| 62% (6978/11279) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1247/2090) |
| 48% (2869/5928) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (584/1222) |
| 45% (938/2084) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (151/333) |
| 44% (7598/17436) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1345/3221) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.31% (80/79) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 65.17% (58/31) | Futures W/L | 56.63% (47/36) |
| 56% (141/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (47/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (33/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (6/17) |
| 58% (49/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 86% (141/121) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (41/38) |
| 14% (141/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (41/2) |
| 18% (114/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (49/10) |